BOTTA SATYA SRINIVASA PRASAD v. THE STATE OF AP.,REP BY PP & ANOTHER
CRLRC/334/2012 · 2025-07-10
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37723 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37723 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010657722012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 334/2012 Between:
BOTTA SATYA SRINIVASA PRASAD, S/O APPA RAO POSTMAN, GANDHINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP REP BY PP ANOTHER, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGHCOURT OF AP., HYDERABAD
2. BADUGU KANAKA DURGA, D/O HANUMAIAH R/O LAMBADIPET, CHITTINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this Memorandum of Crl.RC aggrieved by the Judgment dt 10.2.2012 passed in Crl.A.No.104 of 2010 by the Court of the Session:: Metropolitan Division, Vijayawada (Metropolitan Sessions Judge) Confirming the Conviction imposed in the Judgment dt 22-4- 2010 passed in CC.No.685 of 2007 by the I Addl.C.M.M., Vijayawada, IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CRLRCMP 532 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Judgment dt 10.2.2012 passed in Crl.A.No.104 of 2010 by the Court of the Session:: Metropolitan Division, Vijayawada (Metropolitan Sessions Judge) Confirming the Conviction imposed in the
Judgment dt 22-4-2010 passed in CC.No.685 of 2007 by the I Addl.C.M.M., Vijayawada, and release the petitioner on bail, pending disposal Crl.RC, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
MEDURI VARA PRASADA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been compromised. Hence, the matter has become infructuous.
In view of the above, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 11.07.2025 KAS