MISS RAMBHA RANI SHUKLA v. THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE REGISTRAR GENERAL
C.M.P./104/2024 · 2025-11-20
Sujit Narayan Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37722 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37722 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:34769-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 104 of 2024
1. Miss Rambha Rani Shukla, aged about 45 years, Daughter of Sri Ganesh Tiwari, Resident of Sursudha Apartment Lane, East Boring Canal Road, Pushpanjali House, P.O. Buddha Colony, P.S. Buddha Colony, District Patna, State Bihar, Pin No. 800001.
2. Raman Kumar Shukla, Aged about 50 years, son of Sri Ganesh Tiwari, Resident of Sursudha Apartment Lane, East Boring Canal Road, Pushpanjali House, P.O. Buddha Colony, P.S.- Buddha Colony, District-Patna, State Bihar, Pin No. 800001
... ... Petitioners
Versus
1. The High Court of Jharkhand through the Registrar General having its office at Dhurwa, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi
2. The State of Jharkhand through Principal Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha Department, having office at Project Building, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi
… ... Respondents
--------- CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
--------- For the Petitioners : Ms. Bharti Kumari , Advocate For the Respondents: Mrs. Nalini Jha, Advocate
Mr. Ashutosh Anand, AAG-III
--------- 06/Dated: 20.11.2025 1) Aggrieved by peremptory order passed by a Division Bench of this Court, whereby the petitioner was directed to remove the defects pointed out by the office, failing which the writ petition would stand dismissed without further reference of the Court, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the instant application. 2) Even though this application has been vehemently opposed, but given the fact that it was for the counsel to have removed the defects pointed out by the office of which the objection was probably not in the knowledge of the petitioners, who are
2025:JHHC:34769-DB
litigants in this case, we deem it appropriate to recall the order dated 23.03.2022. After all the litigants can not suffer for the fault of his counsel. Ordered accordingly. 3) Accordingly, this C.M.P. stands disposed of and W.P.(S) No. 1175 of 2019 is ordered to be restored to its original number.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.)
NAFR
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) 20.11.2025 Sharda/MM/ Cp.02