Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sl.No. 812 Court No. 35 G.S.Das
12.08.2025
WPA 20226 of 2024
Md. Kausar Khan -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Samrat Paul
… for the State-Respondent(s)
The petitioner approached this court with a prayer that plying of his vehicle may not be disturbed and/or interfered with.
The enclosures to the writ petition do not contain any information being furnished with the police authorities. Though, prima facie, it reflects that the petitioner purchased the vehicle on the basis of Hire Purchase Agreement.
As none appears on behalf of the State, Mr. Samrat Paul, learned advocate, who ordinarily appears on behalf of the State, is directed to represent the State. His appearance may be regularized by the concerned authority.
Since the vehicle was financed by ICICI Bank Limited, I am of the view that the petitioner would exhaust his remedies before the jurisdictional civil court, as such, further pendency of the writ petition is unwarranted.
With the aforesaid observations, WPA 20226 of 2024 is disposed of.
Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of.
Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)