Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:35755 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 10083 of 2025 ------ Deepak Giri, aged about 48 years, son of Prabhu Giri, resident of village Itkhori, P.O. & P.S.- Itkhori, District- Chatra (Jharkhand). … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party With B.A. No. 10103 of 2025 ------ Jitendra Giri, aged about 48 years, son of Sarju Giri, Resident of village Itkhori Tal, P.O. & P.S.- Itkhori, Dist.- Chatra. … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. A. K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Manish Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P. : Mr. Sudhir Kr. Mahto, A.P.P. ------ 03/28.11.2025 Heard the parties. 2. Both these bail applications arise out of the same police case. Accordingly, both these cases are being disposed of by a common order. 3. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 236/2024 arising out of Itkhori P.S. Case No. 16 of 2024, for the offences registered under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 302, 307 & 452 of the I.P.C., pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Chatra. 4. Bail applications of the petitioners was earlier rejected by this Court vide B.A. No. 10535/2024 and B.A. No. 6643/2024 on the ground that petitioner Deepak Giri had given rod blow on the head of the deceased and name of petitioner Jitendra Giri has come in re- statement of the informant. 5. Learned senior counsel on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. It was further submitted that informant has implicated 12 persons making general allegation against them that they might have assaulted his brother Mithilesh Dangi, due to which he succumbed to his injuries. 6. Attention has also been drawn towards that the re-statement of the informant, in which he has made specific allegation against these petitioners that they had assaulted his brother. It is apparent that these petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. and subsequently informant implicated these petitioners. 7. In view of the aforesaid facts, I am inclined to release the petitioners, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Chatra in connection with S.T. Case No. 236/2024 arising out of Itkhori P.S. Case No. 16 of 2024. 28 November 2025 (Ambuj Nath, J.) Rahul/- Uploaded On- 01 /12/2025