Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010041462025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1413/2025 PABITRA BORA S/O. LATE MOHAN BORA 2: PUNYA PRBHA BORA D/O. LATE MOHAN BORAVILL. 3: PIKUMONI @ PINKI BORA D/O. LATE MOHAN BORAVILL. 4: GITANJALI BORA D/O. LATE MOHAN BORA. 5: TARULATA BORA D/O. LATE MOHAN BORA R/O. VILL.- CHOTTA HAIBOR NAZIRAJAN MOUZA-NIZ-SAHAR P/O. AND P.S. NAGAON SADAR DIST. NAGAON ASSAM (DEFENANT NO. 1 TO 3 5 AND 6 RESPECTIVELY IN THE SUIT VERSUS SANDHYA RANI ROY W/O. SRI HARI CHARAN ROY, A R/O. VILL.- MILANPUR, ADARSHA NAGAR, NEAR NAM GHAR, PIN-782001, P/O. AND P/S. NAGAON SADAR, DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM. 2:BISWA BIPUL BORA S/O. LATE MOHAN BORA 3:MAMONI BORA D/O. LATE MOHAN BORA RESPONDENT 2 AND 3 BOTH ARE R/O. VILL.- CHOTTA HAIBOR Page No.# 2/3 NAZIRAJAN MOUZA-NIZ-SAHAR P/O AND P.S. NAGAON SADAR ASSAM (DEFENDANT NOS. 4 AND 7 IN THE SUIT Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S D PURKAYASTHA, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. T J MAHANTA (R-1), MR. A BORUA(R-1),MR T GOGOI(R- 1),MS P SARMA(R-1),MS. P BHATTACHARYA(R-1) Linked Case : PABITRA BORA Vill. Sitta Haribor Nazirajan Mouza- Niz-Sahar P.S. Nagaon 2: PURNA PRABHA BORA Vill. Sutta Haibor Nazirajan Mouza- Niz-Sahar P.S. Nagaon Sadar 3: PIKUMONI ALIAS PINKI BORA Vill. Sutta Haibor Nazirajan Mouza- Niz-Sahar P.S. Nagaon Sadar 4: GITANJALI BORA Vill. Sutta Haibor Nazirajan Mouza- Niz-Sahar P.S. Nagaon Sadar 5: TARULATA BORA Vill. Sutta Haibor Nazirajan Mouza- Niz-Sahar P.S. Nagaon Sadar VERSUS Page No.# 3/3 SANDHYA RANI ROY Vill.Milanpur Adarsha Nagar Near Nam Ghar P.S. Nagaon Sadar 2:BISWA BIPUL BORA Vill. Sutta Haibor Nazirajan Mouza- Niz-Sahar P.S. Nagaon Sadar 3:MAMONI BORA Vill. Sutta Haibor Nazirajan Mouza- Niz-Sahar P.S. Nagaon Sadar ------------ Advocate for : SUPRATIM DEB PURAKAYASTHA Advocate for : appearing for SANDHYA RANI ROY BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 17.08.2026 Heard Mr. S D Purkayastha, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Ms. P Bhattacharya, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1. None appears for the respondent nos. 2 and 3. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of delay of 243 days in filing the connected appeal. The respondent no. 1 has filed objection. Today, I have heard the learned counsel for both sides. I find that the delay has been satisfactorily explained. Therefore, the delay stands condoned. The connected appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. The interlocutory application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant