[2025:RJ-JP:37560] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11683/2025 Vipin S/o Mukesh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Suraj Cinema, Rampura, Police Station Bhiwadi, District Khairtal, Tijara. (Accused Applicant Lodged In Sub Jail, Kishangarh Bas, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anant Priya Jain Mr. Nousad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 16/09/2025 1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Vipin S/o Mukesh seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.414/2025 dated 31.07.2025 registered at P.S. Bhiwadi District - Bhiwadi, for the offence under Sections 8/20 of NDPS Act. 2. The petitioner was arrested and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the [2025:RJ-JP:37560] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-11683/2025] jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 30.07.2025 after interception, police has arrested two persons Sandeep and the present petitioner Vipin and jointly recovered 4 kg 76 grams ganja, which is less than commercial quantity. He submits that without complying the mandatory provisions under the NDPS Act, search and seizure was effected by the police. He further submits that co-accused Sandeep was also granted bail on 04.09.2025. He further submits that 4 criminal cases were registered against the present petitioner relating to IPC and they were registered in the year 2015-2016. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. 6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 7. On basis of interception during nakabandi on 30.07.2025 by SHO PS Bhiwadi were two accused Vipin and Sandeep going on motorcycle and on interception 4 kg and 76 grams ganja were recovered. A case under Section 8/20 of NDPS Act is registered. There is four more cases against the petitioner accused, out of which three cases related to IPC and one [2025:RJ-JP:37560] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-11683/2025] related to Arms Act. The recovered quantity is less than commercial. 8. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the petitioner-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner-accused. 9. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of petitioner- accused is hereby allowed and the petitioner-accused Vipin S/o Mukesh is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner-accused Vipin shall mark his attendance on first Monday of every month till disposal of criminal case at Police Station Bhiwadi and that attendance shall be forwarded to the trial Court. (ii) The petitioner-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (iii) The petitioner-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iv) The petitioner-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. [2025:RJ-JP:37560] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-11683/2025] (v) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the petitioner-accused shall be liable to be cancelled. 10. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/4