- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10799 WP No. 103492 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO.103492 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI SIDDAPPA S/O SOMAPPA JATTENNAVAR AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC. AGRL., R/O. #2722, NEAR G.B. SCHOOL RAMAPUR SITE, SOUNDATTI, TQ. SOUNDATTI, DIST. BELAGAVI 591126. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.R. TURAMARI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. GADIGEVVA W/O SIDDAPPA JATTENNAVAR AGE. 56 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O C/O. MANJUNATH BASAPPA SANGRESHI, AT. CHIKKUMBI, TQ. SOUNDATTI, DIST. BELAGAVI 591126. 2. UMESH S/O YALLAPPA DIDAGANNAVAR AGE. 28 YEARS, OCC. AGRL., R/O. HARLAPUR, TQ. SOUNDATTI, DIST. BELAGAVI 591126. (OWNER OF THE TATA INDIGO CAR BEARING REG. NO. KA-48 M 0122). 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., BRANCH, SOUNDATTI, TQ. SOUNDATTI, DIST. BELAGAVI 591126. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. N.R. KUPPELUR, ADVOCATE FOR R3; NOTICE TO R1 IS SERVED; NOTICE TO R2 IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 25-06-2022 PASSED BY JUDICIAL CONCILIATOR BEFORE THE LOK-ADALAT IN MVC NO.2587/2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-E & ETC. Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10799 WP No. 103492 of 2022 THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo and submits that the petition does not survive for consideration and has been rendered infructuous. 2. Memo filed by the petitioner reads as hereunder: “The petitioner respectfully submits as under: That in the above petition, the petitioner challenging the Lok-Adalath order. Now the respondent has already received the amount. Hence, the petition becomes infructuous. Hence, the petition may kindly be dismissed as infructuous and dismissed as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity.” In light of the said submission and memo filed, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP, CT:VP