[2025:RJ-JP:48350] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12025/2023 Deepak Kumar Tailor S/o Khem Chand Tailor, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo Hasampur, Tehsil Paten, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Education Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary To The Government, Department Of Personnel, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary-Cum- Commissioner, Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 5. The District Education Officer (Headquarter), Secondary Education, Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devansh Sharma, Dy. GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 26/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “i. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents be directed to allow the Petitioner in the counseling process and if the petitioner find place in merit then consider him for appointment to the post of Assistant Teacher Level II English in pursuance of advertisement dated 15.01.2023 with all consequential [2025:RJ-JP:48350] (2 of 3) [CW-12025/2023] benefits. ii. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the condition No. 10.2 of the advertisement dated 15.01.2023 with regard to educational qualification for Assistant Teacher Level II English may kindly be quashed and set aside and further respondents be directed to consider the qualifications of petitioner as requisite for the post of Assistant Teacher Level II English.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 08.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8348/2023 (Neelam Kumari & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court, at Principal Seat in case of Sudarshan Jangid Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10548/2023) and Pratap Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12131/2023). He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid judgments. 3. Mr. Devansh Sharma, Dy. GC accepts notice. 4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for parties and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of on same terms, if applicable, in light of Sudarshan Jangid (supra), Pratap Ram (supra) and followed in case of Neelam Kumari (supra) by this Court. [2025:RJ-JP:48350] (3 of 3) [CW-12025/2023] 5. It is hereby clarified that we have not verified the veracity of the facts as mentioned in the petitioner, however the respondents are at liberty to verify the same. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /146