Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37701 (CHH)

MANGAL SINGH @ MANGAL DEWAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/6022/2025 · 2025-07-30

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:37471 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 6022 of 2025 1 - Mangal Singh @ Mangal Dewar S/o Avatar Singh Aged About 28 Years R/o Station Maroda, Bajrang Para, Bhilai P/s Newai District - Durg (C.G.) ... Applicant Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Newai District - Durg (C.G.) ... Non-Applicant For Applicant : Mr. Lukesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For Non-Applicant : Mr. Ajeet Singh, Government Advocate along with Mr. T.S. Sahu, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 31/07/2025 1. This is the fifth bail application. The fourth bail application was dismissed on merits vide order dated 11.03.2025 in M.Cr.C. No. 1236/2025. 2. This bail application is filed by the applicant under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 298/2023 registered at Police Station – Newai, District – Durg, Chhattisgarh for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294, 506B, 323, 324, 307 & 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. and under Sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act, 1959. 3. Case of prosecution is that, on 24.11.2023, applicant along with other co- accused persons have assaulted Raman Yadav @ Pappu by means of hands, fists, club and knife. He was taken to hospital where he SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY 2 succumbed to injury. Morgue was reported on the basis of the evidence of eye-witnesses. After morgue inquiry, aforemenitoned crime was registered and applicant was arrested on 05.01.2024. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submit that applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the instant crime, he has not committed any offence as alleged. He submits that this application is filed on account of delay in trial. The applicant is in jail since 05.01.2024 and therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. 5. On the other hand, learned State counsel vehemently opposes the submission made by learned counsel for the applicant and would submit that there are specific allegation against the applicant of assaulting the deceased by means of knife. In support of his contention, he read over the statement of Vishal Yadav and Aman Kumar Yadav recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 7. Taking into consideration, facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegations, submission of learned counsel for the respective parties, documents enclosed along with the bail application and further that the fourth bail application was dismissed on merits vide order dated 11.03.2025 in M.Cr.C. No. 1236/2025, there are specific allegations against the applicant, I do not find present to be a fit case to allow the application for grant of bail. 8. Accordingly, the application for grant of bail is dismissed. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/-Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey