Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3770 (AP)

JAMPANA KIRAN VARMA v. SURAVARAPU VENKATA RAMANA RAO

CRP/137/2024 · 2025-07-17

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010022182024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 137/2024 Between: 1. JAMPANA KIRAN VARMA, S/O KASI VISWA RAMA RAJU, AGED 39 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO.PENT HOUSE NO.L, MADHURI PALACE APARTMENT, OPPO. SANTHI ASHRAMAM, BEACH ROAD, LAWSONS BAY COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SURAVARAPU VENKATA RAMANA RAO, S/o Apparao, Aged 70 years, R/o D.No.4-128, Gollapalem Village, Kajuluru Mandal, Kakinada, East Godavari District ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tobeg to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition to this Honble Court against the Order dated 20.09.2023 in I.A. No.329 of 2023 in O.S No. 138 of 2021 on the file of the III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S No.l38 of 2021 on the file of the III Additional Senior Civil Judge Court, Kakinada pending disposal of the above Civil Revision Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S.V.S.S.SIVA RAM Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: ORDER:- 1. The present revision petition is filed questioning the order dated 20.09.2023 passed in IA No.329 of 2023 in OS No.138 of 2021, on the file of III Additional Senior Civil Judge at Kakinada, East Godavari District. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 3. In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision and accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR 18.07.2025 DR 180 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CRP No.137 of 2024 Date 18.07.2025 DR