Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3769 (RAJ)

SURJEET MEENA @ SANKIT S/O SHRI JAMNALAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/771/2025 · 2025-01-17

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:2557] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 771/2025 1. Surjeet Meena @ Sankit S/o Shri Jamnalal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Guradi Tehsil Chhipabadaud District Baran Raj. (At Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur). 2. Indresh Singh S/o Shri Prabhulal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Gurai Tehsil Chhipabadaud District Baran, Raj. (At Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 17/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.06/2025 registered at Police Station Vidhayak Puri, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence(s) under Section 8/21 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the alleged quantity of contraband articles i.e. smack recovered from the possession of the accused-petitioners is around 38 grams, which is below commercial quantity. There is no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners. The accused-petitioners are in custody since long, trial/investigation of [2025:RJ-JP:2557] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-771/2025] the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the alleged quantity of smack recovered from the possession of the accused-petitioners is below commercial quantity. The accused-petitioners are in custody since long, trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, thus, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Surjeet Meena @ Sankit S/o Shri Jamnalal and 2. Indresh Singh S/o Shri Prabhulal in connection with FIR No.06/2025 registered at Police Station Vidhayak Puri, District Jaipur City (South) shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/64