Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37684 (RAJ)

DINESH KUMAR v. SECRETARY RSMSSB AND ORS

CW/2027/2017 · 2025-10-07

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40714] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2027/2017 Dinesh Kumar S/o Shri Moti Ram, Village Gudhapole Jaspuria Post Lehchora, Tehsil Hindauncity District Karouli, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. Secretary, Rajasthan Subordinate And Minsterial Services Selection Board, State Agricultural Manage, Durgapura, Jaipur 2. Registrar, Rajasthan Para Medical Council, G-1, Kishan Bhawan, Lal Kothi, Jaipur 3. Registrar, Niims University, Rajasthan, Shobha Nagar, Jaiopur Delhi Highway, Jaipur-303121 4. Director Adm. Medical And Health Department Govt. Of Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghu Nandan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bharat Saini Ms. Bharti Sharma for Mr. Achintya Kaushik HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 07/10/2025 Matter comes up on an application No. 2/2025 filed by the learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner stating therein that the controversy involved in the instant writ petition stands squarely covered by the judgment rendered by co-ordinate of this court in the case of Pinki Yadav & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17418/2016 decided on 08.09.2025 and prays [2025:RJ-JP:40714] (2 of 2) [CW-2027/2017] that this matter may also be decided in the light of the aforesaid judgment. Learned Counsel for the respondents do not dispute the aforesaid fact. In view of the submissions made at bar, while allowing the application No. 2/2025, this writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 08.09.2025 rendered in the case of Pinki Yadav (Supra). All pending applications, if any also stand disposed of. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J Mahesh Adwani/169