THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER NWKRTC v. HOLEBASAPPA RAMAPPA AMALAZARI
WP/114587/2015 · 2025-04-02
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3768 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3768 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5882 WP No. 114587 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 114587 OF 2015 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN:
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NWKRTC, BAGALKOT DIVISION, BAGALKOT, THE PETITIONER IS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF LAW OFFICER, CENTRAL OFFICE, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI-580 030. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVAKUMAR.S.BADAWADAGI., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
HOLEBASAPPA RAMAPPA AMALAZARI, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC:DRIVER, R/O:JALIBERI, TQ:MUDHOL, DSIT:BAGALKOT. …RESPONDENT (SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5882 WP No. 114587 of 2015
ORAL ORDER
Though the matter is called twice, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. The petition is filed in 2015. Now we are in the month of April,
2025. It is pending from almost ten years. As already noted above, when the case is called twice, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
RH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48