Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37678 (KAR)

HANAMANTH S/O NAGAPPA CHOLANNAVAR v. SIDDAPPA S/O BEERAPPA PUJAR

WP/107324/2025 · 2025-09-30

Anant Ramanath Hegde

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13613 WP No. 107324 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO.107324 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: HANAMANTH S/O NAGAPPA CHOLANNAVVAR AGE. 48 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. SOMANAKOPPA, TQ. BADAMI, DIST. BAGALKOTE 587101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANJAY CHANAL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SIDDAPPA S/O BEERAPPA PUJAR AGE. 48 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. KULAGERI, TQ. BADAMI, DIST. BAGALKOTE 587101. 2. RUDRAPPA S/O BEERAPPA PUJAR AGE. 48 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. KULAGERI, TQ. BADAMI, DIST. BAGALKOTE 587101. 3. MANJUNATHA S/O BEERAPPA PUJAR AGE. 44 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. KULAGERI, TQ. BADAMI, DIST. BAGALKOTE 587101. 4. GANGAVVA W/O PRABHAKAR BENNUR AGE. 43 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. JAMNAKATTI, TQ. BADAMI, DIST. BAGALKOTE 587101. 5. RENUKA W/O SHIVAPPA GATTI AGE. 42 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. MUSTIGERI, TQ. BADAMI, DIST. BAGALKOTE 587101. 6. LAXMAVVA W/O BEERAPPA PUJAR AGE. 63 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. KULAGERI, TQ. BADAMI, DIST. BAGALKOTE 587101. …RESPONDENTS VINAYAKA B V Digitally signed by VINAYAKA B V Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.10.03 10:02:06 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13613 WP No. 107324 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE ORDER DATED 15.09.2025, PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BADAMI IN O.S.NO.47/2017 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E & ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter sometime submits that the order rejecting the application for summoning the documents will be questioned in an appropriate proceedings/appeal, in case the petitioner looses his case before the trial court. Submission is placed on record. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to question the impugned order, as provided under law. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE MBS, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 2