Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37665 (JHR)

CHINTA DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6404/2025 · 2025-11-12

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:33877 --1-- A.B.A. No. 6404 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6404 of 2025 ---- Chinta Devi, aged about 42 years, C/o Anil Sharma, resident of Chatta Pathar, By pass Mansha Mandir, Asansol, PO and PS – Kaliphari, District – Paschim Bardhaman, West Bengal .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Aditya Kr. Jha, Advocate :- Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Kumar, Advocate :- Mr. Kundan Kr. Jha, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Praful Jojo, Advocate ---- 04/12.11.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Dhanbad G.R.P.S. Case No.108 of 2024, for the alleged offences registered under Section 379 of Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate Railway at Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner happened to be the victim of circumstance. He further submits that mobile phone was purchased by husband of the petitioner which was being used by the petitioner. He then submits that the allegations are there that the said mobile phone was stolen one. He next submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.11 of the petition. 2025:JHHC:33877 --2-- A.B.A. No. 6404 of 2025 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the said mobile was found to be stolen one. 5. Considering that the said mobile was purchased by husband of the petitioner and the petitioner was using the said mobile phone and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.11 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of her surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate Railway at Dhanbad in connection with Dhanbad G.R.P.S. Case No.108 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 12.11.2025 Sangam/