APHC010653552015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7484 Between: 1. PASUMARTHY VENKATA KRISHNA RAO,, S/O. VENKATASWAMY, AGE: 53 YEARS, HINDU MALE, R/O. POTHAVARAM VILLAGE NALJARLA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 1. THE TOBACCO BOARD REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN GUNTUR DISTRICT, - 2. THE AUCTION SUPERINTENDENT, AUCTION PLATFORM NO. APF30, KOYYALAGUDEM. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2nd respondent in passing of the order in file No. 113/30/1(8)/2014 thereby, rejecting the renewal of 20142015 in Tobacco Board Grower Registration (TBGR) No. 30.042.201 on flimsy grounds is illegal, irregular, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and in violation of the provisions of the Tobacco Board Act of 1975 an Rules of 1976 and offends articles 14, 21 and 300 and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to renew the TBGR No. 30.042.201 and pass. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7484 OF 2015 PASUMARTHY VENKATA KRISHNA RAO,, S/O. VENKATASWAMY, AGE: 53 YEARS, HINDU MALE, R/O. POTHAVARAM VILLAGE NALJARLA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND THE TOBACCO BOARD REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN GUNTUR THE AUCTION SUPERINTENDENT, AUCTION PLATFORM NO. APF30, KOYYALAGUDEM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be o issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2nd respondent in passing of the order in file No. 113/30/1(8)/2014-2015/Registration/6367 dated 04 thereby, rejecting the renewal of tobacco barn license for the crop season of 20142015 in Tobacco Board Grower Registration (TBGR) No. 30.042.201 on flimsy grounds is illegal, irregular, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and in violation of the provisions of the Tobacco Board Act of 1975 and the Tobacco Board Rules of 1976 and offends articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to renew the TBGR No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3459] THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM PASUMARTHY VENKATA KRISHNA RAO,, S/O. VENKATASWAMY, AGE: 53 YEARS, HINDU MALE, R/O. POTHAVARAM VILLAGE ...PETITIONER THE TOBACCO BOARD REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN GUNTUR THE AUCTION SUPERINTENDENT, AUCTION PLATFORM NO. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be o issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2nd respondent in passing of the 2015/Registration/6367 dated 04-02-2015 tobacco barn license for the crop season of 20142015 in Tobacco Board Grower Registration (TBGR) No. 30.042.201 on flimsy grounds is illegal, irregular, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and in violation d the Tobacco Board A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to renew the TBGR No. IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 9929 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to reconsider the renewal application by duly suspending the order passed by the 2nd respondent in file No. 113/30/1(8)/2014-2015/Registration/6367 dated 04-02-2015 and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri S.Jaswanth, learned counsel, representing Sri Mangena Sree Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ________________________________________ SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 11th September, 2025. TJN 08 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7484 OF 2015 Dated: 11.09.2025 TJN HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 7484 OF 2015 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 11.09.2025 JS,J The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Vide Separate Order) _______ JS,J TJN