SANJEEV S/O. DASHARATH TUBACHI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/102685/2025 · 2025-07-17
Venkatesh Naik T
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37659 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37659 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8850 CRL.P No. 102685 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2025
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102685 OF 2025 (482 OF Cr.PC/528 OF BNSS)
BETWEEN:
1.
SANJEEV S/O. DASHARATH TUBACHI, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. KAKAMARI VILLAGE, TQ. ATHANI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591265.
2.
SARASWATI W/O. SANJEEV TUBACHI, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. KAKAMARI VILLAGE, TQ. ATHANI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591265.
3.
CHANDRAKANT S/O. DASHARATH TUBACHI, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. KAKAMARI VILLAGE, TQ. ATHANI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591265. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S. B. MALLIGAWAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD, THROUGH AIGALI POLICE STATION.
2.
SARITA W/O. ASHOKE KAMBLE, AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. KAKAMARI, TQ. ATHANI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591265.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. (U/S.528 OF BNSS), SEEKING TO QUASH THE FIR IN AIGALI P.S. CRIME NO.133/2024 UNDER SECTIONS 115(2), 3(5), 352, 76 OF BNS ON THE FILE OF ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ATHANI, IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3 ARE CONCERNED, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad
Bench
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8850 CRL.P No. 102685 of 2025
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T)
Learned HCGP for respondent No.1-State has filed memo along with a copy of ‘B’ Report submitted in this case.
Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (for short ‘the Cr.P.C.’) to quash the FIR and complaint in Crime No.133/2024 of Aigali Police Station, whereas the investigating officer after investigation has filed ‘B’ Report. Hence, the present petition does not survive for consideration.
In view of the memo, the criminal petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE
AC /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18