- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13803 RP No. 100071 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI REVIEW PETITION NO.100071 OF 2023 BETWEEN: NEMANNA JINNAPPA PARAPPANAVAR SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS., MAHAVEER S/O. LATE NEMANNA PARAPPANAVAR, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. DHUPADAL, TQ. GOKAK, TQ. DIST.BELAGAVI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.R. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BHARAMAPPA S/O. JUNNAPPA MAGADUM, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. KONNUR, TQ. GOKAK, TQ. BELAGAVI DISTRICT, CALLING HIMSELF AS BHARAMAPPA A/F JUNNAPPA MUNNOLLI. 2. INDRAWWA W/O. BHARAMAPPA MAGADUM @ MUNNOLLI, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O.DHUPADAL, TQ. GOKAK, DIST.BELAGAVI. RAMAPPA MALLAPPA MUNNOLI SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS., MALLAPPA KADAPPA MUNNOLI SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS., YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Date: 2025.10.15 11:28:03 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13803 RP No. 100071 of 2023 3. TAVANAPPA RAMAPPA MUNNOLI AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.DHUPADAL, TQ. GOKAK, DIST.BELAGAVI. 4. SATTEWWA W/O/ BHIMAPPA MUNNOLLI SINCE DECEASED BY HER LRS., MAHAVEER S/O. BHIMAPPA MUNNOLI, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.KONNUR, TQ. GOKAK, DIST.BELAGAVI. 5. BAHUBALI S/O. BHIMAPPA MUNNOLI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.KONNUR, TQ. GOKAK, DIST.BELAGAVI. 6. SMT. DEVAKKI W/O. TAMANNA DEMANNAVAR, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O.KONNUR, TQ. GOKAK, DIST.BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 R/W. ORDER XLVII RULE (1) R/W. 151 OF C.P.C., PRAYING TO REVIEW/MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.04.2014, PASSED IN R.A.NO.39/2013, BY ALLOWING THE REVIEW PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC. THIS REVIEW PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13803 RP No. 100071 of 2023 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI) This Court on 06.07.2024 passed the following order: “Two weeks time is granted to do the needful, failing which, the review petition shall stand dismissed”. Despite the said conditional order, the review petitioner has not complied with the same. Hence, the review petition stands dismissed. SD/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE YAN Ct:pa List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13