Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3765 (KAR)

SRI. HANAMANT v. SRI. MANAPPA

RFA/100300/2020 · 2025-01-08

Ashok S Kinagi, Umesh M Adiga

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:299-DB RFA No. 100300 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF JANUARY 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100300 OF 2020 (DEC/PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. HANAMANT S/O. BASAPPA SONAR AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BARAGI, TQ: MUDHOL-587313, DIST: BAGALKOT 2. SRI. GIRIMALLAPPA S/O. BASAPPA SONAR AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BARAGI, TQ: MUDHOL-587313, DIST: BAGALKOT 3. SRI. KALAPPA S/O. BASAPPA SONAR AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BARAGI, TQ: MUDHOL-587313, DIST: BAGALKOT …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. MADANMOHAN M KHANNUR, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. MANAPPA S/O DEVAPPA SONAR @ SUTAR Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:299-DB RFA No. 100300 of 2020 AGE: 85 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BARAGI, TQ: MUDHOL-587313, DIST: BAGALKOT SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR’S, ALREADY ON RECORD 1. SRI. BASAVARAJ S/O MANAPPA SONAR @ SUTAR AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BARAGI, TQ: MUDHOL-587313, DIST: BAGALKOT 2. SRI. SHANKARAPPA S/O MANAPPA SONAR @ SUTAR AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BARAGI, TQ: MUDHOL-587313, DIST: BAGALKOT 3. SRI. SHANKARAPPA S/O VENKAPPA SONAR @ SUTAR AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BARAGI, TQ: MUDHOL-587313, DIST: BAGALKOT. 4. SRI. DEVAPPA S/O VENKAPPA SONAR @ SUTAR AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BARAGI, TQ: MUDHOL-587313, DIST: BAGALKOT. 5. SMT. BASAVVA W/O DEVAPPA SONAR @ SUTAR - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:299-DB RFA No. 100300 of 2020 AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD, R/O: BARAGI, TQ: MUDHOL-587313, DIST: BAGALKOT. …RESPONDENTS (NOTICE TO RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 5 ARE SERVED) RFA FILED UNDER SEC. 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD.06.01.2020 PASSED IN O.S.NO.35/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, MUDHOL, DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR DECLARATION, PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA) Learned counsel for the appellants seeks short accommodation. 2. Sufficient time is already granted. 3. Cost was also imposed on last adjourned date and cost has not been paid. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:299-DB RFA No. 100300 of 2020 4. There is no any acceptable reason to adjourn the matter. In view of the peremptory order passed by this Court on 20.12.2024, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (ASHOK S. KINAGI) JUDGE Sd/- (UMESH M ADIGA) JUDGE BVK CT: BSB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34