Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:30614 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 908 of 2023
1. Abhay Kumar Sharma
2. Kumod Choudhary
3. Dashrath Prasad Yadav
4. Hakim Kumar Das
5. Sudhakar Mishra
6. Shakti Shankar Poddar
7. Satish Chandra Das
8. Duryodhan Mahra
9. Ram Prasad Mehra
10. Ajay Kumar Amar
11. Heera Kumar Routh
12. Aziza Praween
13. Raymani Kullu
14. Parwati Devi
15. Md. Ayub Ali
16. Md. Irfan
17. Md. Farooque Azam
18. Prem Rajak
19. Babulal Panjiyara
20. Madhusudan Rana
21. Ramakant Mandal
22. Nepal Kuma Mandal
23. Mukesh Mandal
24. Nargis Anjum
25. Rekha Kumari
26. Deepak Kumar Paswan
27. Md. Shamin Ahmad
28. Suresh Prasad Yadav
29. Asha Kumari
30. Binod Kumar Sharma
31. Gautam Kumar Paswan
32. Dulal Mondal
33. Laxman Kumar
34. Sunita Kumari
35. Dharmendra Kumar Verma
36. Md. Shanbaz Alam
37. Dolly Gupta
38. Baleshwar Prasad Mahato
… … Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Ranchi
3. Director, Primary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Ranchi
4. Chairman, Jharkhand Academic Council, Ranchi
5. Secretary, Jharkhand Academic Council, Ranchi
6. State Project Director, Jharkhand Education Project Council, Ranchi
( 2025:JHHC:30614 ) 2
7. Secretary, Jharkhand Education Project Council, Ranchi
…
… Opp. Parties ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Ms. Bharti V. Kaushal, Advocate
For the JAC : Ms. Risheeta Singh,
A.C. to Mrs. Richa Sanchita
For the State
:Mr. Mukesh Kumar Mehta, A.C. to G.P. VI
---
07/26.09.2025
Learned counsel for the parties are present.
2. This petition has been filed for restoration of W.P. (S) No. 658 of 2020 which stood dismissed on 28.09.2022on account of non removal of defects within the stipulated period.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that on account of reasons beyond the control of the petitioners, the defects could not be removed. She submits that otherwise they are ready to remove the defects if the writ petition is restored.
4.
Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no serious objection to the prayer for restoration.
5. Considering the aforesaid submissions and being satisfied with the cause shown, the time for removal of defects in W.P. (S) No. 658 of 2020 is extended till 07.11.2025.
6. If the defects in the writ petition are removed within the extended period, office is directed to place the writ petition before appropriate Bench as per roster.
7. This CMP is accordingly disposed of.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 26.09.2025 Binit