Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37643 (HP)

DEVA NAND v. HIMANSHU SHARMA AND OTHERS

CMP.M/1498/2025 · 2025-11-28

Sushil Kukreja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Deva Nand Vs. Himanshu Sharma & Ors. CMP(M) No. 1498/2025 28.11.2025 Present: Mr. Vishal Bindra, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. P.S. Chandel, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. CMP(M) No. 1498/2025 No reply to the application is intended to be filed. Heard. In view of the averments made in the application, this Court find sufficient cause to condone the delay of 32 days’ that has occurred in filing the present appeal. Consequently, the application is allowed and delay of 32 days’ that has occurred in filing the present appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. FAO No. /2025 Appeal be registered. Heard. Admit. List for final hearing alongwith FAO No. 149 of 2025 in due course. ...2... CMPST No. 36281/2025 Application be registered. Heard. Subject to deposit of 50% of the award amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, within a period of six weeks, the operation and execution of impugned award dated 15.03.2025, passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P., in MAC Petition No. 01/2020, titled Himanshu Sharma & Anr. Vs. Suresh Kumar & Anr., shall remain stayed during pendency of the main appeal. Alteration, modification or vacation, on motion. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 28th November, 2025 (raman)