Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37641 (JHR)

ANKIT RUIDAS ALIAS ANKIT RAIDAS v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./9771/2025 · 2025-12-02

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. (2025:JHHC:36035) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9771 of 2025 Ankit Ruidas @ Ankit Raidas, aged about 21 years, S/o Sukumar Ruidas @ Anil Raidas, R/o Village- Brakar, Mimakalani, Das Para, P.O. & P.S.- Kulti, District- Burdwan (West Bengal) … Petitioner - Versus - The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party WITH B.A. No. 9772 of 2025 Anand Ravidas @ Anand Rabidas, aged about 24 years, S/o Anil Ravidas @ Anil Rabidas, R/o Village- Chirkunda, Niche Bazar, Das Para, P.O. & P.S.- Chirkunda, District- Dhanbad … Petitioner - Versus - The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party WITH B.A. No. 9783 of 2025 Sachin Ravidas @ Sachin Rabidas, aged about 30 years, S/o Anil Ravidas @ Anil Rabidas, R/o Village- Chirkunda, Niche Bazar, Das Para, P.O. & P.S.- Chirkunda, District- Dhanbad … Petitioner - Versus - The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl.P.P. --- 03/02.12.2025 All these Bail Applications arise out of same police case. Accordingly, all these bail applications are being disposed of by a common order. Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 65 of 2025, for the offences registered under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 61(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 66C, 66D of the I.T. Act, pending in the court of learned Special Judge (Cyber Cases), Dhanbad. On 01.09.2025, Cyber Police Dhanbad, on the basis of confidential information that cyber criminals have assembled near Lower Bazar Chirkunda, raided the place of occurrence and apprehended four persons. On search, seven mobile phones were recovered from the place of occurrence. It was submitted that joint seizure list was made by the raiding party. It was further submitted that there is no specific allegation as to which mobile phone was recovered from each of the accused. -2- Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, learned Spl. P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that during course of investigation, it transpired that one of the mobile phones so recovered was used in cheating a person. However, on specific query, as to from whose possession this mobile phone was recovered, it was submitted that this fact has not come during the course of investigation. In view of the submissions made above, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (Cyber Cases), Dhanbad, in connection with Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 65 of 2025. (Ambuj Nath, J.) December 2, 2025 Jay/- Uploaded on 03.12.2025