IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 206 RSA-3028-1999 (O&M) Date of Decision.:20.05.2025 Shinder Singh Appellant Vs. Chand Kaur Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: None. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) On 14.10.2024, following order was passed: “There is no representaon on behalf of the appellant. Noce issued to respondents No.1, 2, 5 and 6 has been received back with the report that they have since expired. Respondents No.11 to 15 have been duly served either personally or through their brother. Nobody has appeared for these respondents and as such, respondents No.11 to 15 are proceeded ex parte. Noce issued to respondents No.3, 4, 7, 8, 9 and 10 have been received back unserved for one or the other reason. Appellant is directed to provide latest correct and complete address of the unserved respondents and then noce to them be issued for 18.12.2024. Appropriate applicaon be also moved to bring on record the LRs of deceased respondents No.1, 2, 5 and 6.” Today it is reported by the registry that counsel for the appellant has not furnished the fresh addresses of the unserved respondents, due to which the noces could not be issued. NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.05.20 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-3028-1999 (O&M) -2- It is thus apparent that neither anybody is appearing on behalf of the appellant nor the order dated 14.10.2024 has been complied. Even on 14.10.2024, nobody had appeared for the appellant. All the circumstances indicate that appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the appeal. Dismissed in default for want of prosecuon. ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE May 20, 2025 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.05.20 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document