Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37639 (JHR)

MD NASIM ALI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./7327/2025 · 2025-12-19

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:38340 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No.7327 of 2025 Md. Nasim Ali, aged about 37 years, son of Md. Nesar Ali, Resident of village Gangpur PO and PS Gidhour District-Chatra (Jharkhand) …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay, APP ------ 2/19.12.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chatra Sadar P.S. Case No. 334 of 2025, registered under sections 318 (4) of Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023 and section 63/65 of Copy Right Act, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that false allegations are made of keeping duplicate CRI cable wire and the petitioner is having a shop. He next submits that recovery was not made from the shop of the petitioner and in the seizure list, it is stated that the said cable wire has been produced before the police by one Binod Kumar Tiwari and the case has been registered under the Copy Rights Act. He next submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in Para 13 of the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of keeping duplicate CRI cable wire in the shop. 2025:JHHC:38340 2 5. Looking into the contents of the FIR, it transpires that the said cable wire was produced by one Binod Kumar Tiwari. It was not seized from the shop of the petitioner, the case has been registered under Sections 63 and 65 of Copy Right Act and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as aforesaid, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner above named is directed to surrender before the learned Court within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order and on the event of his surrender / arrest, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount of each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra, in connection with Chatra Sadar P.S. Case No. 334 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 7. This Anticipatory Bail Application is accordingly allowed and disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 19.12.2025 R.Kumar