Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37638 (AP)

SMT. POTNURU BHARATHI v. POTNURU VENKATA RAO

FCA/128/2009 · 2025-09-11

Battu Devanand, Challa Gunaranjan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010648602009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3555] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 128/2009 Between: 1. SMT. POTNURU BHARATHI, W/O. VENKATA RAO, HOUSEWIFE R/O. POLAYYAPETA, CANTONMENT, VIZIANAGARAM. ...APPELLANT AND 1. POTNURU VENKATA RAO, S/o. Nagam, R/o. Balarampuram, Near Bheemasingi Sugar FActory, Jami Revenue Mandal, ...RESPONDENT Appeal is filed to set aside the order and decree passed in FCOP.No. 18/2008 dated 26.11.2008 on the filed of the Judge, Family Court, at Vizianagaram filed by the respondent / petitioner IA NO: 1 OF 2009(FCAMP 124 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 27 days in filing the above appeal IA NO: 2 OF 2009(FCAMP 262 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to suspend the order and decree in FCOP 18/08 dt. 26.11.2008 pending file of the Judge, Family Court at Viziamagaram, further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and Counsel for the Appellant: 1. KRISHNA RAO MODHALAVALASA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. G RAMA GOPAL The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.128 of 2009 JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) Learned counsel for the appellant submits that during pendency of the appeal, the appellant and the respondent have amicably settled the issues between them and they are living together. As such, further adjudication in this appeal is not warranted. 2. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant, in our considered view, no further adjudication is required in this Appeal. 3. Accordingly, this Family Court Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. 4. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND _____________________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Dated: 12.09.2025 TM THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.128 of 2009 Dt.12.09.2025 tm