Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37637 (JHR)

BAL MUKUND KAPRI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4525/2025 · 2025-10-30

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:32661 --1-- A.B.A. No. 4525 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4525 of 2025 ---- Bal Mukund Kapri, aged about 35 years, S/o Bhagirath Kapri, R/o Rampur, PO – Motiya Dumariya, PS – Rampur, District – Godda .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Tarun Kr. No.1, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Advocate ---- 05/30.10.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Giridih (T) P.S. Case No.236 of 2024, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned C.J.M., Giridih. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegations are made against the petitioner and two others stating that they were custodian of locker in the finance company. He further submits that the allegations are there of missing of Rs.10,71,320/-. He then submits that by the last order case diary was called for and in paragraph No.8 of the case diary it has come that Kumkum Kumari who happened to be the Field Officer has stated that Amit Kumar Singh has taken the amount and has also tampered with CCTV Camera. He also submits that the petitioner 2025:JHHC:32661 --2-- A.B.A. No. 4525 of 2025 has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.11 of the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the petitioner also happened to be the custodian of the locker key. 5. Looking into the case diary particularly at paragraph No.8, it transpires that Kumkum Kumari who happened to be the Field Officer has stated that Amit Kumar Singh has tampered with CCTV Camera and has also misappropriated the amount. In the attending facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Giridih in connection with Giridih (T) P.S. Case No.236 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 30.10.2025 Sangam/