Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37636 (RAJ)

SANJU BALWADA D/O SHRI JAI DAYAL SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/4314/2022 · 2025-11-25

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47820] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4314/2022 Sanju Balwada D/o Shri Jai Dayal Singh, Resident Of D10, F-2, Soumya Diamond, Kendriya Vihar Road, Ramnagariya South Jagatpura, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan , Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur. 3. Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate Jaipur, Government Hostel, M.i Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. S.h.o Police Station Ramnagariya, Jaipur City (East), Rajasthan. 5. Jhamman Lal, Head Constable (Enquiry Officer Of Complaint No. 278770622200144 ), Police Station Ramnagariya, Jaipur City (East), Rajasthan. 6. Manoj Soni S/o Unknown, Resident Of D10, F-1, Soumya Diamond, Kendriya Vihar Road, Ramnagariya South Jagatpura, Jaipur. 7. Vijay Laxmi Soni W/o Manoj Soni, Resident Of D10, F-1, Soumya Diamond, Kendriya Vihar Road, Ramnagariya South Jagatpura, Jaipur. 8. Gurvinder S/o Unknown, Resident Of 2Nd Floor, Soumya Ruby, Behind Soumya Diamond, Kendriya Vihar Road, Ramnagariya, South Jagatpura, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr.Devi Singh, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 25/11/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:47820] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4314/2022] 1. This criminal misc. petition is lying pending before this Court in defect side for last several years and no steps have been taken by the counsel for the petitioner to cure the defect(s). 2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this matter and has lost interest in pursuing this matter. 3. In view of the above, the instant criminal misc. petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. 4. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to move application for revival of this criminal misc. petition, in case, any cause of action or grievance still survives. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /305