- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (209) RSA-3713-1998 (O&M) Date of Decision:-11.08.2025 M/S SACHHA ZINK SULPHATE AND FERTILIZERS … Appellant Versus PUNJAB FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND ANOTHER ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- None for the appellant. Mr. P.S. Bajwa, Advocate, for respondent. VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for respondents submits that he has received an Email from the respondents that matter has been settled and the loan of the appellant has already been adjusted under OTS Scheme on 31.03.2011. A copy of an Email is taken on record, today in the Court. 2. No one is present on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant after settlement of the account is not interested in pursuing the appeal, as such, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution, subject to condition that in case anybody intends to pursue the appeal on behalf of the appellant, then an application in that respect can be moved within a period of three months from today for restoration of the appeal. 3. Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands also disposed of. ( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 11.08.2025 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No GAURAV SOROT 2025.08.13 09:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document