[2025:RJ-JP:40571] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13450/2025 Jagdish Prasad Atal S/o Late Shri Prabhati Lal Atal, Aged About 63 Years, R/o B-14, Ayodhya Nagar, Lalarpura, Near Gandhi Path, Bhura Patel Marg, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur Through Secretary & Smt. Nalini Kathotiya W/o Unknown At Present Working As Secretary JDA, Jaipur, Indra Circle, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur 2. Shri Dharmendra Yadav S/o Unknown, At Present Working On The Post Of Chief Enforcement Controller, Jaipur Development Authority. Jaipur 3. Shri Ashok Saini S/o Unknown, At Present Working As Enforcement Officer, Zone-PRN-II-17, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur 4. Smt. Sangeeta Parewa W/o Shri Suresh Parewa, R/o 234, Nemi Nagar Extension, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur Constructed Place- Plot No. B-13, Ayodhya Nagar, Lalarpura, Near Gandhipath, Bhura Patel Marg, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devendra Kumar Bhardwaj, Adv. For Respondent(s) : - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 07/10/2025 1. This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to learned Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as 'learned Appellate Tribunal') to dispose of the [2025:RJ-JP:40571] (2 of 2) [CW-13450/2025] Contempt Petition No.01/2024 titled as Jagdish Prasad Atal Vs. JDA Jaipur & Ors. as early as possible. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 16.10.2023, learned Appellate Tribunal directed the respondent No.4 to raise the construction in the disputed plot according to the sanction issued by the JDA and left the set back as per the site plan. Learned counsel further submits that respondent No.4 has not raised the construction according to the site plan and the sanction issued by the JDA and, thereby, has committed contempt of the order passed by the learned Appellate Tribunal on 16.10.2023, for which the petitioner has moved contempt petition against respondents, but the same is pending for the last 2 years. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the present petition may be disposed of at this stage by giving directions to learned Appellate Tribunal to dispose of the Contempt Petition No.01/2024 pending before it as early as possible. 4. Accordingly, the present civil writ petition is disposed of with the direction to learned Appellate Tribunal to dispose of the Contempt Petition No.01/2024 pending before it as early as possible. 5. Stay application and all other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /5