Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3763 (JHR)

Ms A2Z Infra Engineering Limited Through Its Duly Authorised Representative Mr Ankur Gupta v. Jharkhand Bijli Vitaran Nigam Limited Through Its Managing Director And Ors

WPC/3388/2017 · 2025-06-13

Rajesh Shankar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:15370-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 3388 of 2017 M/s A2Z Infra Engineering Limited, a company duly incorporated under the Companies Act, having its registered Office at 0-116, First Floor, Shopping Mall, DLF City, Phase-I, P.O. & P.S.-DLF City Phase-I, District- Gurgaon-122002, Haryana, through its duly authorised representative-Mr. Ankur Gupta, son of Sri K.K. Gupta, Deputy General Manager (Legal), resident of Plot No. B, 38, Sector-32, Gurgaon, P.O.-Rajiv Chowk, P.S.- Sadar, District-Gurgaon (Haryana). … … … Petitioner Versus 1. Jharkhand Bijli Vitaran Nigam Limited, Engineering Building, HEC, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi; through its Managing Director; 2. Managing Director, Jharkhand Bijli Vitaran Nigam Limited, Engineering Building, HEC, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi; 3. Electrical Superintending Engineer (RE), Jharkhand Bijli Vitaran Nigam Limited, Engineering Building, HEC, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi; 4. Deputy General Manager (F & A), Jharkhand Bijli Vitaran Nigam Limited, Engineering Building, HEC, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi; 5. Chief Engineer (C & R), Jharkhand Bijli Vitaran Nigam Limited, Engineering Building, HEC, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District- Ranchi; 6. Chief Engineer (RE)-cum- Chief Engineer (S&P), Jharkhand Bijli Vitaran Nigam Limited, Engineering Building, HEC, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi; … … … Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. S.C. 05/Dated: 13.06.2025 Counsel for the petitioner states that the Writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) APK/VK