APHC010650462023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 33689/2023 Between: 1. SHAIK EMAM, S/O. RAMJAN, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 53 YRS, OCC.ASST SUB-INSPECTOR POLICE(1402), (NOW UNDER SUSPENSION), R/O.D.NO.L 1-11884, SUBBAREDDY COLONY, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, W.G.DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SPL CHIEF SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, HOME DEPARTMENT, POLICE BHAVAN, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DIST. 3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ELURU RANGE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DIST. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DIST. 5. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, ELURU, W.G.DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the inaction of respondents in reinstating the petitioner into service even expiry of two years from the date of suspension vide order in C.No.40/P 1/2021 R.O.No.524/2021 dated 10.08.2021 issued by the 3 respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, discriminatory and contrary to the G.O.Ms. No's.679(General Administration (Services-C) Dept, dated 1.11.2008 and G.O.Ms.No.526(General Administration (Services-C) Dept, dated 19.08.2008 and G.O.Ms.No.86(General Administration (Services-C) Dept, dated 8.032.1994 and also in violation of settled law of principle and consequently direct the respondents to revoke the suspension order dated 10.08.2021 in C.No.40/P 1/2021 R.O.No.524/2021 with consequential benefit of promotion in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into his Job as Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G L NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Ms. Y.Sushma, learned counsel representing Sri G.L. Nageswar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that by efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 08.01.2025 TVN 361 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.33689 OF 2023 Date : 08.01.2025 TVN