APHC010649702015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 35224/2015 Between: 1. CH. PARVATHI PARAMESWARA,, S/O LATE SRIRAMAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O D.NO.8-2-33, MAIN ROAD, TUNI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. CH.SRIRAMAVARUN,, S/O. JAGANNADHA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O 4-13-39 TO 4-13-40, MAIN ROAD, TUNI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. D.B.PATTABHI RAMA RAO,, S/O LATE APPALA NARASIMHA VEERA - VENKATA SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O 6-1-2, BELLAPU VEEDHI, MAIN ROAD, TUNI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. D.B.VENKATA SOMA SUNDARA RAO,, S/O LATE APPALA NARASIMHA VEERA - VENKATA SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O 6-1-2, BELLAPU VEEDHI, MAIN ROAD, TUNI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2 2. THE VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEMENT AUTHORITY, SIRIPURAM JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP. BY ITS VICE-CHAIRMAN, 3. THE TUNI MUNICIPALITY, TUNI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 4. THE TUNI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, TUNI MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS CHAIRPERSON ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 2. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU SC For VUDA and MUDA 3. VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that this Court on 28.10.2010 directed the respondent authorities to follow due process of law for any further action of demolishing of the petitioners’ properties for the purpose of road widening. 2. It is submitted that no further action has been taken by the respondent authorities and the petitioners are in possession of the properties. 3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed in terms of the interim order. It is made clear to the respondent authorities that any proposal to acquire or demolish the petitioners’ properties for the purpose of road widening, the due process of law shall be followed. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt: 20.08.2025 SR