Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37624 (PNJ)

JASVINDER KAUR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/9470/2025 · 2025-04-04

Sudhir Singh, Sukhvinder Kaur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-9470-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9470-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 04.04.2025 Jasvinder Kaur ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present: Ms. Gurjit Kaur Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, and Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. *** SUDHIR SINGH (ORAL) By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to decide his claim for allotment of plot under the ‘Oustees Category’ in lieu of his land, which has been acquired by the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that aggrieved from the inaction of the respondents, the petitioner has already served a legal notice dated 16.12.2024 (Annexure P-10) upon the respondents, but no action has been taken AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.11 12:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-9470-2025 (O&M) -2- thereon till date. He further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if the respondent authorities are directed to deal with his concerns/grievances and pass appropriate order on the said legal notice. 3. Served with the advance copy of the petition, Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 and 3 is present in Court and submits that the said legal notice shall be considered and looked into by the competent authority, in accordance with law. 4. Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 (competent authority), to look into the legal notice dated 16.12.2024 (Annexure P-10) of the petitioner and take an appropriate action thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 04.04.2025 Ajay Prasher Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.11 12:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document