[2025:RJ-JP:40892] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14986/2025 Bhanwar Lal Saini S/o Manohar Lal Saini, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Phadila, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Ra- jasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secre- tary (Department Of Home), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The Director General Of Police, (Headquarter) Lal Kothi, Jaipur Rajasthan. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, Jhunjhunu, District Jhun- jhunu, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Yadav For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 07/10/2025 1 Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon judgment in case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India Through Its Secretary and Another reported as AIR 2015 SC 2389 submits that present petitioner was placed under suspension vide order dated 07.02.2025 and petitioner is entitled to reinstatement pending inquiry. He further submits that the petitioner was suspended on false allegations and the allegations are not sufficient to warrant suspension in contemplation of enquiry. He further submitted [2025:RJ-JP:40892] (2 of 2) [CW-14986/2025] that placing a public servant under suspension for a longer duration is also against the public policy. 2 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and perused the judg- ment as referred by learned counsel for petitioner along with material on record. 3 Present petitioner, who was appointed as Constable No. 949 was suspended at Reserve Police Line Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan by the Deputy Inspector General of Police-cum-SP District Jhunjhunu on 07.02.2025. 4 Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondent within a period of two weeks from now raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to dispose of the representa- tion with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to com- municate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /61