Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37623 (JHR)

DILIP YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8775/2025 · 2025-09-26

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:30495] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8775 of 2025 ------ Dilip Yadav aged about 27 Yrs., S/O Raghu Gope, R/O village Kumbhahar Gadiya, P.O. & P.S. Giridih (M), District- Giridih .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Tarun Kumar No.1, Advocate For the State : Ms. Ruby Pandey, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-26-09-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case No.339 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Section 147/149/341/323/307/379/504/506 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was a member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly, attempted to murder the member of the informant’s party. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that for the self- same occurrence from the side of the petitioner, the mother of the petitioner lodged Giridih (M) P.S. Case No.337 of 2023 and as an afterthought after delay of three days, this case has been instituted. It is then submitted that the informant party is aggressor. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 21.06.2025 as is evident from para-10 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-10 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witness of the case during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Giridih in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case No.339 of 2023 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witness of the case during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 26.09.2025 Saroj/