APHC010651902014 Ilia'S IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI m MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 917 OF ■>rnA Revision fifed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., aggrieved by the order dated 25-02-2014 passed in CrI.R.P.No. 79 of 2013 on the fife of the II Addrtional District and Sessions Judge, Madanapalli, preferred against the order dated: 07-06-2013 passed in M.C.No. 35 of 2008 on the file of the II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate Madanapalli. Between: RAO 1. K.Srilatha, aged 43 years, W/o. Sri K.P 2. K.S.Thanoj, aged 12 Ravi. years, S/o. K.P.Ravi, being minor mother and natural guardian K.Srilatha. represented by (Both the petitioners are R/o. 17/91-4-9, Rajiv Nagar, Madanapalli Chittoor District.) ...Petitioners (Respondents-Petitioners) AND 1. K.P. Ravi, aged 47 years. S/o. K.T Prakash, Postal Employee H.No.33 IT| Layout, Behind M.S Ramaiah College Bangalore, Karanataka State. 2. The State of A.P., Rep by its Public Pradesh. R/o. Mathikire, Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra ...Respondent lA NO: 2 OF 2014(CRLRCMP 1628 OF 9niA Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order in CrI.R.P No.79 of 2013 in the court of II Additional District and Sessions praying that in the circumstances Judge, Madanapalli dated 25-02-2014 pending CrI.R.C. jA NO: 3 OF 2014(CRLRCMP 1629 OF ?nid Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to pay Rs.20,000/- towards legal expenses. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri M N Narasimha Counsel for the Respondent No.1: None Appeared Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Public Prosecutor The Court made the following order: Reddy APHC010651902014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 912/2014 Between: 1. K.SRILATHA, CHITTOOR DT & ANR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. K P RAVI KARNATAKA STATE ANR REP PP, - ...RESPONDENT Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to the order in CrI.RP.No. 79 of 2013 in the court of the II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Madanapalli dated 25-02-2014 may be setaside, restoring the order passed in M.C.No. 35 of 2008 on the file of the II Additional J.F.C.M. Madanapalli dated 07-06-2013. / lA NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLRCMP 1354 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the production of the certified copy of the order in M.C.No. 35 of 2008 in the court of the II Addl. J.F.C.M. Madanapalli dated 07-06-2013 for the present. lA NO: 2 OF 2014fCRLRCMP 1628 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased lA NO: 3 OF 2014fCRLRCMP 1629 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1 .M N NARASIMHA REDDY \ Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Mr. M.Chiranjeevi Babu, learned M.V.Narasimha Reddy, learned counsel for the counsel representing Sri revision petitioners submitted that, according to his instructions, the parties settled out of the Court and the matter became infructuous and no further orders are required. As seen from the record, the petitioner has preferred the Revision questioning the maintenance order passed by the trial Court. In view of the representation of the learned petitioners, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, sh^tand counsel for the closed. \ Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madanapalli, Chittoor District. 2. The II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Madanapalli, Chittoor District. 3. One CC to Sri M N Narasimha Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CC's to The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] 5. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of A.P. 6. Two CD Copies SAM nm \' SAM HIGH COURT TIWR.J DATED:14/07/2025 ORDER CRLRC No. 912 of 2014 DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS INFRUCTUOUS