Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37619 (BOM)

SADASHIV SHIVRAM KAMBLE. v. AATMARAM DNYANU KAMBLE

CAS/1100/2018 · 2025-06-20

Shri M M Sathaye

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

34-CAS-1100-2018.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1100 OF 2018 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 5943 OF 2017 Sadashiv Shivram Kamble and Ors. ...Applicants Versus Aatmaram Dnyanu Kamble and Ors. ...Respondents **** Mr. Bhushan Jadhav i/b Mr. Chetan Patil for the Applicants. Mr. Soham Powar i/b Mr. Anand Patil for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. **** CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J. DATE : 20th JUNE, 2025 P.C. : 1. Heard learned Advocates for the parties. 2. This is an application for condonation of nominal delay of 9 days. Learned Advocate for the Respondents opposes the prayer of delay condonation and submits that proper explanation is not given. However, no reply is filed. 3. In view of the averments in the application, sufficient cause is made out. Application is allowed. Delay is condoned. (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) Sneha Chavan 1/1 SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN Digitally signed by SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN Date: 2025.06.21 11:50:13 +0530