[2025:JHHC:30498] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8800 of 2025 ------ Sunny Kumar Ram @ Sunny Ram, aged about 35 years, Son of Suresh Ram, Resident of Village- Talaiya Basti Word No.7, P.O.- Jhumri Tilaiya, P.S.- Tilaiya, District- Koderma. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Jay Prakash Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-26-09-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No.324 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 117(2), 109(2), 126, 127(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner attempted to commit murder of Phool Devi by assaulting on her head causing grievous injury on her head and attempting to murder others. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that there is no independent witness in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.07.2025 as is evident from para-4 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State on the other hand opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that keeping in view of serious allegation against the petitioner of attempting to commit murder of Phool Devi by assaulting on her head causing grievous injury on her head, there is every chance of the petitioner absconding and tampering with the evidence, if released on bail. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner ought not to be released on bail. Considering the serious nature of allegation against the petitioner as well as the chance of his absconding and tampering with the evidence, if released on bail, this Court is not inclined to admit the bail of the above named petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the above named petitioner is rejected. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 26.09.2025 Saroj/