Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.19358 of 2025
Decided on: 10th December, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Amar Singh Negi
…..Petitioner
Versus
H.P. University and another
.....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Harmohan Thakur, Advocate vice
Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. Devender K. Sharma, learned counsel and Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, respectively.
2.
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the decision rendered in Dr. Hem Raj Sharma Vs. Himachal Pradesh University and Another2.
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 CWP No.6284 of 2024, decided on 12.09.2025
2
3.
Having perused the averments contained in the petition, especially relief clause vis-à-vis the decision rendered in Dr. Hem Raj Sharma2, this Court finds that case of the petitioner is identical to the aforesaid case. Vide the aforesaid decision, Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has already dealt with all the points raised in the instant petition and as such, respondents can be directed to decide the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment rendered by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
4.
Consequently, in view of the above, the directions contained in the aforesaid judgment rendered by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Dr. Hem Raj Sharma2 are ordered to be made mutatis mutandis applicable in the present case for all intents and purposes.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 10, 2025
Judge rohit