Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.16530 of 2025 Decided on: 12th November, 2025 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Suresh Kumar
…..Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others .....Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vinod K. Gupta, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Vinod K. Gupta, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents.
2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage.
3. Petitioner’s grievance is that his representation dated 01.08.2025 (Annexure P-4) seeking applicability of Dhani Ram verus H.R.T.C and another2 has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2CWP No. 5179 of 2022 , decided on 16.03.2023, a/w connected matters,
2 petitioner
would
be
content
in
case
the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.
4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 01.08.2025 (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Dhani Ram2 within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua November 12, 2025 Judge yogesh