M/S Mukesh Raj Re-Relling Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. The State of Bihar through Shri Dipak Kumar Singh, the Additional Chief Secretary
MJC/1399/2025 · 2025-07-25
Satyavrat Verma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37607 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37607 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1399 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15379 of 2024 ======================================================
1. M/S Mukesh Raj Re-Relling Mills Pvt. Ltd. a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Thana Chouk, Khagaria, represented through its Director namely Mukesh Kumar, male, aged about 55 Years, S/O Late Manohar Prasad, R/o Thana Chouk, Khagaria, P.S.- Khagaria, District- Khagaria.
2. Mukesh Kumar, S/o Late Manohar Prasad, R/o Thana Chouk, Khagaria, P.S.- Khagaria, District- Khagaria.
3. Rajesh Kumar, S/o Late Manohar Prasad, R/o Thana Chouk, Khagaria, P.S.- Khagaria, District- Khagaria.
4. Suresh Prasad @ Suresh Kumar, S/o Late Vijay Chand Prasad, R/o Thana Chouk, Khagaria, P.S.- Khagaria, District- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Shri Dipak Kumar Singh, the Additional Chief Secretary Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. Amit Kumar Pandey, The District Collector, Khagaria.
3. Smt Aarti, The Additional Collector, Khagaria, District- Khagaria.
4. Swati Kumari, The Deputy Collector of Land Reforms, Khagaria, District- Khagaria.
5. Brajesh Kumar Patil, The Circle Officer, Circle- Khagaria, District- Khagaria. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sudama Kumar, AC to SC-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 6 25-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AC to SC-12 for the State.
2. Learned State Counsel submits that L.P.A. No. 673 of 2025 was filed against the order dated 09.05.2025 passed in the instant contempt application. It is further submitted that L.P.A. No. 673 of 2025 was decided by an order dated
Patna High Court MJC No.1399 of 2025(6) dt.25-07-2025 2/2 09.07.2025 and it was recorded at para 18 ‘considering this aspect of the matter, we dispose the appeal with a direction that the records of the M.J.C. No. 1399 of 2025 would stand closed with the liberty to the writ petitioners to approach the appropriate forum for the needful, if so desired.’
3. Since the instant contempt proceeding has been closed by the order of the Hon’ble Division Bench, as such, the contempt application is dismissed.
Kundan/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U