APHC010650612009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2037/2009 Between: 1. RAVELLA LAKSHMI RAJA RAO, S/O CHENCHAIAH, CULTIVATION R/O D.NO.58-115(1), PURNADASU STREET, SANTHAPET, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 2. RAVELLA SAI BHARGAVI, D/O LAKSHMI RAJA RAO, STUDENT BEING MINOR, REP. BY HER MOTHER & NATURAL GUARDIAN RAVELLA PADMA, W/O LAKSHMI RAJA RAO, MUPPAVARAM VILLAGE & POST, 3. RAVELLA SAI YAMANI, D/O LAKSHMI RAJA RAO, STUDENT BEING MINOR, REP. BY HER MOTHER & NATURAL GUARDIAN RAVELLA PADMA, W/O LAKSHMI RAJA RAO, MUPPAVARAM VILLAGE & POST, ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to call for the entire records connected to Order dated 05.10.09 passed in M.C.No.85 of 2008 by the learned Judge, Family Court, Prakasam at Ongole. IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CRLRCMP 2853 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 C.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Order stay of execution of the Order dated 05.10.09 passed in M.C.No.85 of 2008 by the learned Judge, Family Court, Prakasam at Ongole, pending disposal of the Crl.R.C. IA NO: 2 OF 2010(CRLRCMP 5998 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 C.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2. AKKAM ESHWAR THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.2037 of 2009 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case has been filed challenging the order of the trial Court granting maintenance at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per month to 2nd and 3rd respondent each, as the petitioner is not satisfied with the quantum of maintenance awarded. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. None appeared for the respondent Nos.2 and 3. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no instructions have been received from the petitioner. 4. It seems that the parties are not showing interest to prosecute the matter and without proper representation from both sides, this Court could not proceed further. 5. In the result, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non- prosecution. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 03.09.2025 M K K