HEMLATA GURJAR W/O PRADHUMN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/12475/2025 · 2025-10-14
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37604 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37604 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.12475/2025 Hemlata Gurjar W/o Pradhumn Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Tigariya, Police Station Nayi Mandi, Hindaun City, District Karauli, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narendra Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Addl.GA/PP with Mr. Shubham Kumar Sain JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 14/10/2025
1. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner in connection with FIR No.40/2024, registered at Police Station Special Police Station (SOG), District ATS and SOG, wherein she is charged for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC and Section 66D of the IT Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR has been registered against several accused persons, out of which co-accused persons namely Kamal Singh, Pradhuman Singh, Hitesh Bhadu, Vimlendu, Narayan, Ranglal and Manoj Kumar have already been granted indulgence of bail by different Co- ordinate Benches of this Court. Counsel submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and the case of the petitioner is at par with the case of co-accused persons, to whom benefit
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-12475/2025] of bail has already been extended. Counsel submits that the petitioner
is
in custody and trial will take its own time to conclude, so the same indulgence be granted to the petitioner as well.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.
4. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that co-accused persons namely Kamal Singh, Pradhuman Singh, Hitesh Bhadu, Vimlendu, Narayan, Ranglal and Manoj Kumar have already been granted indulgence of bail and the alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate and the case of the petitioner is at par with the case of co-accused persons and trial will take its own time to conclude and without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS.
5. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Hemlata Gurjar W/o Pradhumn Singh arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided she furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/146