Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37601 (RAJ)

MADAN LAL S/O SHRI RAM RATAN MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/13560/2025 · 2025-10-08

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41494] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13560/2025 Madan Lal S/o Shri Ram Ratan Meena, Aged About 53 Years, Resident Of Village- Nayabas, Tehsil- Nim Ka Thana, District - Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan Police Headquarters, Jaipur. 3. The Joint Principal Secretary, Department Of Home (Group-11), Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. The Superintendent Of Poice, Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Ojha For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- “i. The Respondents are directed to decide the representations dated 28.12.2023 and 18.02.2025 filed by the Petitioner regarding expungement of adverse entry in his APAR within a time-bound period, preferably within 4 weeks from the date of this order. ii. The Respondents are directed to expunge the adverse entry recorded in the Petitioner's [2025:RJ-JP:41494] (2 of 3) [CW-13560/2025] APAR for the period 08.07.2020 to 06.01.2021, being based on the same misconduct for which disciplinary punishment has already been imposed, thereby constituting double punishment. iii. Award costs of the petition to the Petitioner; iv. Any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also passed in favor of the petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:41494] (3 of 3) [CW-13560/2025] 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /55