Ms A2Z Infra Engineering Limited Through Its Duly Authorised Representative Mr Ankur Gupta v. Jharkhand Bijli Vitaran Nigam Limited Through Its Managing Director And Ors
WPC/3381/2017 · 2025-06-13
Rajesh Shankar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3760 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3760 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:15353-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (C) No. 3381 of 2017 M/s A2Z Infra Engineering Limited, a company duly incorporated under the Companies Act, having its registered Office at 0-116, First Floor, Shopping Mall, DLF City, Phase-I, P.O. & P.S.-DLF City Phase-I, District-Gurgaon-122002, Haryana, through its duly authorized representative-Mr. Ankur Gupta, son of Sri K.K. Gupta, Deputy General Manager (Legal), resident of Plot No. B, 38, Sector-32, Gurgaon, P.O.- Rajiv Chowk, P.S.-Sadar, District-Gurgaon (Haryana).... Petitioner
Versus
1. Jharkhand Bijli Vitaran Nigam Limited, Engineering Building, HEC, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi; through its Managing Director;
2. Managing Director, Jharkhand Bijli Vitaran Nigam Limited, Engineering Building, HEC, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District- Ranchi;
3. Electrical Superintending Engineer (RE), Jharkhand Bijli Vitaran Nigam Limited, Engineering Building, HEC, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, District-Ranchi;
4. Deputy General Manager (F&A), Jharkhand Bijli Vitaran Nigam Limited, Engineering Building, HEC, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi;
5. Chief Engineer (C & R), Jharkhand Bijli Vitaran Nigam Limited, Engineering Building, HEC, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District- Ranchi;
6. Chief Engineer (RE)-cum- Chief Engineer (S&P), Jharkhand Bijli Vitaran Nigam Limited, Engineering Building, HEC, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi;
... Respondents
--------- CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
--------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. S.C.
--------- 05/Dated: 13.06.2025
Counsel for the petitioner states that the Writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.)
(Rajesh Shankar, J.) APK/VK