Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3760 (GAU)

Tachin Sidisow v. The State of AP and 2 Ors

WP(C)/393/2025 · 2026-08-19

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040014002025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/393/2025 Tachin Sidisow Son of Shri Miali Sidisow, permanent resident of Bhalukpong, West Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh. 790114 VERSUS The State of AP and 2 Ors represented by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and Head of Forest Force, Environment Forest and Climate Change, Arunachal Pradesh 791111 2:The Chief Conservator of Forest Headquarters Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh 791111 3:Kamrap Kanglom Age: 0 Occupation : Deputy Forest Ranger Changlang Changlang District Arunachal Pradesh. 79212 Advocate for the Petitioner : Domo Boje, M Basar,Teli Ango,Gojum Nyodu,Mebom Jilen Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 20.08.2026 Mr. D. Boje, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, writ petition stands closed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant