1 APHC010022402025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1181/2025 Between: 1. ANKAM SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGED 56 YEARS OCC PIPING ENGINEER AT SINGAPORE R/O. D.NO.3-253, SIVALAYAM VEEDHI, SANKHAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. SUNKARA RAMA CHANDRA RAO,, S/O. ADINARAYANA AGED 64 YEARS OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. GIDAJAM VILLAGE, KODURU POST, ROWTHALAPUDI MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 3. SUNKARA GANGA RAO, S/O.GAVARRAJU, AGED 56 YEARS OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO.2-49, OC PETA, GIDAJAM VILLAGE, KODURU POST, ROWTHALAPUDI MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 4. GAVIREDDY NARAIAH DORA, S/O. AGED 38 YEARS OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. GUNUPUDI VILLAGE, NATHAVARAM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 5. KARAKA MANENDRA, S/O.VENKATARAMANA, AGED 38 YEARS OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. GUNUPUDI VILLAGE, NATHAVARAM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT AT ANAKAPALLI. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NATHAVARAM POLICE STATION, NATHAVARAM, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 4. GEDDAM NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. LATE PAIDINAIDU, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. BUTLAPALEM, AMALAPURAM MANDAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NANI BABU ROBBA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents, particularly 3rd respondent insisting petitioners to appear before their authority at the instance of 4th respondent in connection with Crime No. 206 of 2024 of Nathavaram Police Station, Anakapalli District registered against 5th petitioner and others for being bindover every day and threatened them to open a Rowdy sheet and Ganja cases against them and made illegal detention, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of articles 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioners personal life, liberty nor ask them to appear before his authority.” 2. Heard Sri Robba Nani Babu, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, at the instance of Respondent No.4, Respondent No.3 is calling the Petitioners to the Police Station relating to a money transaction. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Police not to interfere with the civil dispute between the Petitioners and the unofficial Respondent and to follow due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.01.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.1181 of 2025 Dt.10.01.2025 Dinesh