Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37595 (BOM)

BHIMRAO DATTU JADHAV v. KERUBHAI VASANT CHOUGULE AND ORS

IA/7924/2024 · 2025-07-30

Shri Madhav J Jamdar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

915-IA-7924-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.7924 OF 2024 IN REJECTED CASE NO.2468 OF 2019 Bhimrao Dattu Jadhav …Applicant Versus Kerubhai Vasant Chougule & Ors. …Respondents _______________________________________________________________ Mr. Prathamesh Bhargude a/w Mr. Sumit Sonare i/b Mr. Aditya Raktade, for the Applicant. Mr. Manoj Patil, for the Respondent No.3. _______________________________________________________________ CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED: 30th JULY 2025 P.C.: 1. The relief sought in the Interim Application is to set aside the conditional order dated 14th October, 2019 passed by the learned Registrar (Judicial-II) by which conditional order was passed by directing removal of office objections within a period of 4 weeks, failing which registration of the Second Appeal was directed to be refused. 2. Mr. Bhargude, learned Counsel states that when the Second Appeal was dismissed, the same was at the pre-admission stage. Although, Mr. Patil, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.3 i.e. Contesting Respondent strongly opposes the Interim Application, however, for the reasons set out in the Interim Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) on the condition that the Vaibhav Page No. 1 915-IA-7924-2024.doc office objections will be removed within a period of 8 weeks from today. 3. Accordingly, the Interim Application is disposed of in above terms, with no order as to costs. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Vaibhav Page No. 2