Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37593 (CHH)

SUNITA TOPPO v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/8792/2025 · 2025-09-09

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:CGHC:46073 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8792 of 2025 Sunita Toppo W/o Shri Suresh Toppo Aged About 42 Years Presently Posted As Pharmacist Grade- I I At District Hospital, Jashpur, District- Jashpur, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, P S And P O Rakhi, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 2 - Director Directorate Of Health Services, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 3 - Collector District- Jashpur, C.G. 4 - Chief Medical And Health Officer District- Jashpur, C.G. ...Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Ghanshyam Kashyap, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri S Choubey, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 10.09.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as per the Transfer Policy, a Committee has been constituted to consider the grievances of the employees, therefore, he seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to take recourse to law available to him. He would also submit that petitioner has already moved representation(s) before the Committee for redressal of his grievances. Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.09.11 10:38:59 +0530 Wps 8792 of 2025 2 2. Learned State counsel not opposed the above submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of above, present petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue the remedy available to him before the Committee, constituted under the Transfer Policy. 4. Accordingly, present petition stands disposed of. 5. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE padma