IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 207 RSA-3683-1998 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.03.2025 BALWANT RAI .... Appellant Versus SOHAN LAL AND ORS. .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: None for the appellant. Ms. Anamika Sheoran, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 5. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. As per office note, appellant has expired. 2. There is no representation on his behalf. 3. Similar was the position on the previous occasion. 4. No one has come forward to pursue the appeal. 5. It seems that the appellant/his legal representatives are not interested in the litigation. 6. Dismissed in default for want of prosecution. 7. However, liberty is granted to the appellant/his legal representatives to seek revival of the appeal, in case, anything worthwhile survives for consideration. 27.03.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) pooja saini JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Pooja Saini 2025.03.28 16:44 I attest the integrity and accuracy of this order/judgment